Science – The Matrix of Masonic Mind Control
Science – The Matrix of Masonic Mind Control
Philip Collins explains how the Illuminati took
control of science and determined our assumptions
about the nature of reality.
Scientists play the game or risk ostracism.
This article summarizes the thesis of Collins’ book, (left.)
“The
ruling class seized control of science and used it as an
‘epistemological weapon’ against the masses.”
by Phillip D. Collins
April 27, 2008
(Abridged & Edited by henrymakow.com)
As antiquity gave way to modern
history, the religious power structure shifted to an autocracy of the
knowable, or a ‘scientific dictatorship.’
Subtly and swiftly, the
ruling class seized control of science and used it as an
‘epistemological weapon’ against the masses. This article will show
that the history and background of this ‘scientific dictatorship’ is
a conspiracy, created and micro-managed by the historical tide of
Darwinism, which has its foundations in Freemasonry.
The Epistemological Cartel
In The Architecture of Modern
Political Power, Daniel Pouzzner outlines the tactics employed by
the elite… Among them is: ‘Ostensible
control over the knowable, by marketing institutionally accredited
science as the only path to true understanding’ (Pouzzner, 75).
The word ‘science’ is derived from the
Latin word scientia, which means ‘knowing.’ Epistemology is the study
of the nature and origin of knowledge. The ruling
class has bribed the ‘bookkeepers’ (i.e., natural and social
scientists).
Meanwhile, the masses practically deify the
‘bookkeepers’ of the elite, and remain ‘ignorant of the methodology
of the bookkeeping.’ The unknown author of Silent Weapons for Quiet
Wars provides an eloquently simple summation: ‘The means is
knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue:
Who will be the beneficiary?’ (Keith, Secret and Suppressed, 203).
In
Brave New World Revisited , Aldous Huxley more succinctly defined
this epistemological cartel:
The older dictators fell because they
could never supply their subjects with enough bread, enough circuses,
enough miracles, and mysteries.
Under a scientific dictatorship,
education will really work’ with the result that most men and women
will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of
revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a
thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown (Huxley,
Brave New World Revisited, 116).
This is the ultimate objective of the
elite: an oligarchy legitimized by arbitrarily anointed expositors of
‘knowledge’ or, in Huxley’s own words, a ‘scientific dictatorship.’
The New Theocracy
How did the ‘scientific dictatorship’
of the twentieth century begin? In earlier centuries, the ruling
class controlled the masses through more mystical belief systems,
particularly Sun worship. Yet, this would all change. In Saucers of
the Illuminati, Jim Keith documents the shift from a theocracy of the
Sun to a theocracy of ‘science’:
Since the Sun God (and his various
relations, including sons and wives) were, after several thousands
years of worship, beginning to fray around the edges in terms of
believability, and a lot commoners were beginning to grumble that
this stuff was all made up, the Illuminati came up with a new and
improved version of their mind control software that didn’t depend
upon the Sun God or Moon Goddess for ultimate authority (Keith,
Saucers of the Illuminati, 78).
Priests and rituals were soon
supplanted by a new breed of ‘bookkeepers’ and a new ‘methodology of
bookkeeping.’ Keith elaborates:
As the Sun/Moon cult lost some of its
popularity, ‘Scientists’ were quick to take up some of the slack.
According to their propaganda, the physical laws of the universe were
the ultimate causative factors, and naturally, those physical laws
were only fathomable by the scientific (i.e. Illuminati) elite
(Keith, Saucers of the Illuminati, 78-79)...
It must be understood that this new
institution of knowing is a form of mysticism like its religious
precursors. Contemporary science is predicated upon empiricism, the
idea that all knowledge is derived exclusively through the senses.
Yet, an exclusively empirical approach relegates cause to the realm
of metaphysical fantasy. This holds enormous ramifications for
science...
The British Royal Society: (Mason Satanists Remove God from the Universe)
The new secular church and clergy of
the elite originated within the walls of the British Royal Society.
The creators of the Royal Society were also members of the Masonic
Lodge. According to Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln in Holy Blood, Holy
Grail:
Before the advent of the British Royal
Society, science (i.e., the study of natural phenomena) and theology
(i.e., the study of God) were inseparable.
Of course, this conclusion was
antithetical to the doctrine of the scientific dictatorship, which
contended that ‘the physical laws of the universe were the ultimate
causative factors’ (Keith, Saucers of the Illuminati, 78-79).
Metaphysical naturalism (i.e., nature is God) had to be enthroned.
Meanwhile, God’s presence in the corridors of science had to be
expunged. To achieve this, the Royal Society created a Gnostic
division between science and theology, thus insuring the primacy of
matter in the halls of scientific inquiry (Tarpley).
THE DARWIN PROJECT
In the article ‘Toward a New Science of
Life,’ EIR journalist Jonathan Tennenbaum makes the following the
statement concerning Darwinism:
Now, it is easy to show that Darwinism,
one of the pillars of modern biology, is nothing but a kind of cult,
a cult religion. I am not exaggerating. It has no scientific validity
whatsoever. Darwin’s so-called theory of evolution is based on
absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific
observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for
political-ideological reasons (Tennenbaum).
Given Darwinism’s roots in occult
Freemasonry and its expedient promotion of an emergent species of
supermen, this is a fairly accurate assessment. Charles Darwin acted
as the elite’s apostle, preaching the new secular gospel of
evolution. Darwinism could be considered a Freemasonic project, the
culmination of a publicity campaign conducted by the Lodge. Evidence
for this contention can be found in controversial Protocols of the
Wise Men of Sion.…
Consider the
following excerpt from the Protocols, which reads distinctly like a
mission statement:
For them [the masses or cattle] let
that play the principal part which we have persuaded them to accept
as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view
that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind
confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the goyim [the
masses or cattle] will puff themselves up with their knowledge and
without any logical verification of it will put into effect all the
information available from science, which our agentur specialists
have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their
minds in the direction we want.
Do not suppose for a moment that these
statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we
arranged for Darwinism [emphasis added], Marxism, and Nietzsche-ism
(reprint in Cooper, 274-5).
It was the grandfather of Aldous
Huxley, T.H. Huxley, who would act as the ‘official spokesman for the
recluse Darwin’ (White, 268). Many years later, Aldous would propose
a ‘scientific dictatorship’ in Brave New World Revisited. Whether
Aldous made this proposition on a whim or was penning a concept that
had circulated within the Huxley family for years cannot be
determined. Given the family’s oligarchical tradition, the latter
assertion remains a definite possibility. Yet, there may be a deeper
Freemasonic connection, suggesting that the concept of a ‘scientific
dictatorship’ may have originated within the Lodge.
–
Jim Perloff - Darwin is an Illuminati Scam
—————– Darwin – Stock Picker
Cornelius B — Archeological Finds Debunk Darwinism
Source: http://henrymakow.com/2013/11/The-Scientific-Dictatorship .html
©2013 Joak [USA Zicutake Comment]